Dog Bite Topic: Fatal Dog Attacks
Fatal Dog Attacks:
The Stories Behind the Statistics
By Karen Delise

"There is nothing to fear except the persistent
refusal
to find out the truth, the persistent refusal
to analyze the causes of happenings."
--Dorothy Thompson, (1894 - 1961)
Today’s media is filled with sensational headlines of dog attacks.
Routinely quoted in these newspaper accounts are dated statistics from
the Centers for Disease Control. The last CDC study released documented
which breeds of dogs caused the most human fatalities from 1979 through
1998. While the CDC did an admirable job of studying fatal dog attacks,
and went to great lengths to point out that irresponsible owners were
the cause of most of these incidents, the media and lawmakers continue
to use CDC statistics to substantiate claims that certain breeds of dogs
are inherently more "vicious" than other breeds.
After reviewing over 431 cases of fatal dog attacks it is apparent there
is no single factor that translates in a lethal encounter between a
person and a dog(s). A fatal dog attack is always the culmination of
past and present events that include: inherited and learned behaviors,
genetics, breeding, socialization, function of the dog, physical
condition and size of the dog, reproductive status of dog, popularity of
breed, individual temperament, environmental stresses, owner
responsibility, victim behavior, victim size and physical condition,
timing and misfortune. While many circumstances may contribute to a
fatal dog attack, the following three factors appear to play a critical
role in the display of canine aggression towards humans:
- Function of the dog - (Includes: dogs acquired for fighting, guarding/protection or image enhancement)
- Owner responsibility - (Includes: dogs allowed to roam loose, chained dogs, dogs and/or children left unsupervised, dogs permitted or encouraged to behave aggressively, animal neglect and/or abuse)
- Reproductive status of dog - (Includes: unaltered males dogs, bitches with puppies, children coming between male dog and female dog in estrus)
It is necessary to emphasize that a fatal dog attack is an exceptionally
rare event, yet many communities and cities believe that the solution to
prevent severe and fatal dog attacks is to label, restrict or ban
certain breeds of dogs as potentially dangerous. If the breed of dog was
the primary or sole determining factor in a fatal dog attack, it would
necessarily stand to reason that since there are literally millions of
Rottweilers, Pit Bulls and German Shepherd Dogs in the United States,
there would have to be countless more than an approximate 20-25 human
fatalities per year. Since only an infinitesimal number of any breed is
implicated in a human fatality, it is not only unreasonable to
characterize this as a specific breed behavior by which judge an entire
population of dogs, it also does little to prevent fatal or severe dog
attacks as the real causes and events that contribute to a fatal attack
are masked by the issue of breed and not seriously addressed.
From 1965 - 2001, there have been at least 36 different breeds/types of
dog that have been involved in a fatal attack in the United States.
(This number rises to at least 52 breeds/types when surveying fatal
attacks worldwide). We are increasingly becoming a society that has less
and less tolerance and understanding of natural canine behaviors. Breed
specific behaviors that have been respected and selected for over the
centuries are now often viewed as unnatural or dangerous. Dogs have
throughout the centuries served as protectors and guardians of our
property, possessions and families. Dogs have also been used for
thousands of years to track, chase and hunt both large and small
animals. These natural and selected-for canine behaviors seem to now
eliciting fear, shock and a sense of distrust among many people.
There seems to be an ever growing expectation of a "behaviorally
homogenized" dog - "Benji" in the shape of a Rottweiler. Breeds of dogs
with greater protection instincts or an elevated prey-drive are often
unfairly viewed as "aggressive or dangerous". No breed of dog is
inherently vicious, as all breeds of dogs were created and are
maintained exclusively to serve and co-exist with humans. The problem
exists not within the breed of dog, but rather within the owners that
fail to control, supervise, maintain and properly train the breed of dog
they choose to keep.
Any dog, regardless of breed, is only as dangerous as his/her owner
allows it to be.
This study was conducted not to determine which breeds of dogs caused
fatalities, but rather to examine the circumstances and events that
precipitated an attack. Knowing how many Pit Bulls or Rottweilers caused
a human fatality has little applicable value, only when examining each
case individually can we hope to gain insight into the HUMAN and CANINE
behaviors that contributed to these tragic events. Only when we become
more knowledgeable, humane and responsible in our treatment of dogs can
we hope to prevent future tragedies.
- Above content ©Copyright 2002, 2007 Karen Delise
- For further information, see http://www.fataldogattacks.com/